You're Thinking About Empathy All Wrong

Written By Adam Blak

Recognizing Empathy Beyond Feeling

Watch what happens when a child falls on a playground. Anywhere in the world, the scene unfolds with a stunning, predictable grace. Before conscious thought, before cultural conditioning, before any learned response, there is a moment of pure recognition that passes between human beings. The other children turn toward the sharp cry. Their play stops. Their faces mirror a flicker of concern. Someone, often a complete stranger, moves to help. This response crosses every boundary we have created for ourselves—language, nationality, religion, social class. A child from rural Bangladesh and a child from urban Sweden will show identical patterns of recognition and care.(1) The injured child’s distress registers immediately in the surrounding minds, triggering a coordinated response that serves the group's survival and well-being.

This is not mere sentimentality. This is a high-speed, complex social computation happening in an instant. It is one of humanity's most remarkable achievements: the ability to accurately detect, model, and respond to the inner states of other conscious beings. It operates below the threshold of rational analysis, more reliably than cultural instruction. It is a form of intelligence.(1)

This capacity for what we call "empathy" is not a soft skill or an emotional luxury; it is as fundamental to our species as language or tool use. It is the sophisticated information-gathering and error-correction mechanism that allows us to navigate the most complex environment of all: the minds of others.(1) It is a building block of morality and a key ingredient of successful relationships, enabling everything from the trust between two strangers in a marketplace to the vast, coordinated efforts of global science.(2) Yet, despite being our most essential tool for connection, the word itself has become vague and soft-edged. We use it as a catch-all for everything from pity to mind-reading.(1)

The common dismissal of empathy as a "soft skill" represents a profound cognitive error, a form of intelligence blindness that fails to recognize a complex computational process simply because it operates in the social-emotional domain. Our culture often creates a false dichotomy between "hard" skills like logic and mathematics and "soft" skills like communication. However, research in social neuroscience and social intelligence demonstrates that social-emotional processing involves intricate neural networks and high-level cognitive operations.(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) The ability to accurately model another's mind is a computational task involving perception, inference, and prediction.(9, 10) To label this faculty "soft" is a categorical mistake, akin to calling a supercomputer's ability to model weather patterns "soft" because the output involves clouds. The underlying process is computationally intensive. To truly harness its power, to wield it as the superpower it is, we must first understand its architecture. We must unpack the word, examine its components with scientific precision, and learn to use them with the skill of a trained artisan. For this intelligence, when consciously cultivated, is the very engine of The Good Work.(1)

The Architecture of Human Connection

To wield empathy as a precise instrument, we must first move beyond its casual, blurred meaning and establish a clear taxonomy of its distinct components. Psychologists and neuroscientists have identified a spectrum of empathic experience, ranging from primal reflexes to sophisticated intellectual skills.(2, 11, 12) Understanding these distinctions is the first step in cultivating a more robust and reliable moral compass.

These distinct forms of connection can be understood as a spectrum, ranging from primal reflexes to sophisticated, integrated responses. The most foundational layer is Emotional Contagion, the unconscious and automatic "catching" of another's feelings without thought.(1, 13) This is a form of primal resonance, a biological response driven by our brain's mirroring systems, exemplified when one baby's cry triggers another to cry as well.(1, 14) A more considered response is Sympathy, which involves feeling sorrow for another's misfortune while maintaining a degree of emotional distance.(1) Its core function is to express concern through general emotional processing, such as when offering condolences to a friend who has lost their job.(1)

A deeper connection is found in Affective Empathy, the powerful ability to truly feel with someone by sharing their emotional state.(11, 12) This emotional sharing is linked to the Mirror Neuron System (MNS), as well as the insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). A classic example is feeling a pang of anxiety when a friend describes a stressful situation.(1) While a potent connector, this form of empathy can be a "fickle moral guide".(1) Our emotions are not always fair; we naturally feel stronger affective empathy for those who are similar to us or part of our in-group, a bias that can lead to partiality and moral inconsistency.(15, 16) Furthermore, an over-reliance on affective empathy can lead to personal distress, emotional exhaustion, and burnout, as it is negatively correlated with effective emotion regulation.(17, 18)

This is why, for the purposes of The Good Work, we must elevate a different, more disciplined form of this intelligence: Cognitive Empathy. This is the most powerful and reliable form of empathy, defined not by feeling, but by understanding. It is the intellectual skill of actively and intelligently stepping into another being's inner world to accurately perceive and understand their thoughts, beliefs, motivations, and perspective.(1, 2, 11) This capacity, also known as empathic accuracy or perspective-taking, is a core component of social and emotional intelligence.(4, 19) This intellectual modeling is supported by the brain's mentalizing network, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and temporo-parietal junction (TPJ). An expert negotiator, for example, uses cognitive empathy to understand an opponent's needs and find a mutually acceptable solution, often while keeping their own emotions in check.(1, 20) It is this cognitive dimension that transforms empathy from a fleeting sentiment into a robust tool for ethical action, allowing us to extend our care beyond the familiar and the emotionally resonant.(1)

Finally, the fusion of these capacities leads to Compassionate Empathy. This is the ultimate goal, the state in which clear-eyed cognitive understanding sparks a genuine desire to act in ways that help others.(1, 10, 11) This motivation to act is the engine that turns understanding into caring action, combining cognitive and affective systems to move us from simply knowing how someone feels to doing something about it.(1)

The Social Brain's Machinery of Understanding

This remarkable ability to model other minds is not a mysterious or metaphysical event. It is the product of a sophisticated social computation system, a biological marvel built into our neural architecture and refined over millions of years of evolution.(1) The human brain operates on two primary processing modes to achieve this feat: a rapid, automatic "bottom-up" system for emotional resonance and a more deliberate, controlled "top-down" system for cognitive understanding.(7)

The Resonant Power of Mirror Neurons

The biological foundation for our automatic, resonant empathy—our capacity for affective empathy and emotional contagion—is the Mirror Neuron System (MNS).(1, 7) First discovered in monkeys, these remarkable brain cells, located in areas like the inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule in humans, fire both when we perform an action and when we simply observe someone else performing that same action.(7) This system creates a direct, internal simulation of another's experience, giving us a gut-level sense of their actions and emotions without conscious thought.

This "perception-action coupling" extends beyond simple motor movements. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated that observing another person in a specific emotional state activates the same neural networks involved in experiencing that state ourselves. When we see a face expressing disgust or watch someone experience pain, our own brain regions associated with disgust and pain—primarily the anterior insula (AI) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)—become active.(7, 21) This shared neural activation is the biological mechanism of "feeling with" another person. It is an automatic, bottom-up process that provides a raw, immediate stream of data about the emotional world of others.

The Intelligent Framework of Theory of Mind

While the mirror system provides the raw data of emotional resonance, it is our "top-down" processing capabilities that transform this data into intelligent understanding. This more deliberate, controlled form of empathy is crucial for navigating complex social situations without being overwhelmed by constant emotional contagion.(7)

The cornerstone of this system is a capacity known as Theory of Mind (ToM), or mentalizing.(2, 9) This is the critical developmental milestone, typically achieved between ages three and five, where a child realizes that other people have minds, beliefs, intentions, and knowledge different from their own.(1, 22, 23) This understanding is the foundational building block for all higher-order cognitive empathy. It allows us to move beyond simply mirroring another's feelings to actively considering their unique perspective.

This sophisticated cognitive feat is supported by a distinct network of brain regions, often called the "mentalizing network." Key hubs include the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), and the superior temporal sulcus (STS).(7, 22, 24) When we are asked to infer another's beliefs, intentions, or thoughts, it is this network that lights up in brain scans. This is the neural machinery of cognitive empathy.

The interplay between these two systems reveals why a disciplined, cognitive approach to empathy is so vital. The bottom-up, affective system can lead to personal distress and emotional burnout, which can paradoxically inhibit our willingness to help.(11, 13, 18) The top-down system, regulated by the prefrontal cortex—the brain's center for executive function and emotional control—allows for sustainable compassion.(7, 8, 19) It maintains a crucial self-other distinction, enabling us to understand another's suffering with clarity and concern without becoming paralyzed by it. Cognitive empathy is not just a different type of empathy; it is a more regulated, sustainable, and neurologically mature form. It is the intelligence that manages the raw data of affective resonance to produce effective, compassionate action without self-destruction.

The Cognitive Science of Dehumanization

If empathy is such a natural and powerful human intelligence, why is the world so often filled with cruelty, exploitation, and indifference? The answer is as troubling as it is predictable: the empathic signal can be deliberately and systematically jammed.(1) The "Machine" of dogma and the divisive narratives of oligarchal and nationalist forces work by exploiting a predictable vulnerability in our tribal psychology, short-circuiting our natural capacity for empathy at a fundamental, neurological level.(1, 25)

The scientific term for this phenomenon is the "empathy gap," a robust and well-documented tendency for humans to show favoritism toward members of their own group (in-group) while feeling less empathy for, and sometimes even pleasure at the misfortune of, members of other groups (out-groups).(14, 16, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30) This bias is not a conscious choice to be cruel; it is a deep-seated feature of our evolutionary history.

The precise neural mechanism of this failure was captured in a series of landmark fMRI studies on "dehumanized perception" by social neuroscientists Lasana Harris and Susan Fiske.(1, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36) In their experiments, they showed participants images of people from various social groups, ranging from respected in-groups (like students) and pitied groups (like the elderly) to what they termed "extreme out-groups"—those perceived as low in both warmth and competence, such as homeless individuals and drug addicts.

The results were stunning. For most social groups, viewing the images caused normal activation in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), a critical hub of the brain's social cognition and mentalizing network. This is the brain's signature for recognizing another mind. However, when participants viewed images of the extreme out-groups, the mPFC remained quiet.(31, 32, 35) The brain failed to engage in the spontaneous social cognition it normally extends to other people. Instead of the mPFC, regions like the insula and amygdala activated, a pattern consistent with the emotion of disgust.(34, 35) In essence, the brain processed the faces of these dehumanized individuals with the same low level of social engagement it might reserve for an object, like a rock.(1) The empathic signal was not just jammed; as the source material aptly states, "the receiver has been turned off".(1)

This research provides a chillingly precise explanation for how systemic cruelty can be carried out with such calm, bureaucratic efficiency. The core of dehumanization is not an act of heightened negative emotion like rage; it is a profound cognitive failure, a literal de-mentalizing of the other person. The mPFC, the "thinking about other minds" region, simply goes offline. The target is no longer perceived as a fellow human with thoughts, feelings, and intentions, but as an object to be managed, a problem to be solved, or a thing to be discarded. One does not need to hate a spreadsheet to delete a row. This cognitive state is the necessary precondition for the kind of detached, systemic harm described in frameworks like Project 2025 and enacted by the "oligarchal power" that treats human lives as commodities.(25, 37) It explains how otherwise decent people can participate in or remain indifferent to systems that cause profound suffering: their brains have been conditioned to no longer recognize the victims as fully human.

The Performance Advantage of Empathy

If cognitive empathy is a form of high-level intelligence, its presence should be a measurable and decisive factor in real-world performance. The evidence from organizational psychology, leadership studies, and negotiation science confirms this hypothesis with overwhelming force, demonstrating that empathy is not merely a virtuous trait but a strategic advantage. It is, as the core premise of this work suggests, the non-negotiable prerequisite for effective communication and collaboration.

Leadership Effectiveness

The link between a leader's empathy and their team's performance is one of the most robust findings in management research. Meta-analyses and large-scale studies consistently show that empathetic leaders cultivate environments of high psychological safety, where team members feel trusted and respected.(38, 39, 40) This safety, in turn, is a direct driver of positive outcomes. Employees of empathetic leaders report higher job satisfaction, are more innovative, and show greater engagement in their work.(38, 40) Empathy is a cornerstone of emotional intelligence, a quality that has been shown to be more critical to leadership success than IQ alone.(19, 39, 41) An empathetic leader is able to accurately understand the needs, hopes, and stressors of their team members, allowing them to provide targeted support, motivate effectively, and build genuine loyalty.(38, 39)

Negotiation Outcomes

In the high-stakes environment of negotiation, cognitive empathy is a powerful strategic tool. It is the ability to accurately model the counterpart's perspective, priorities, interests, and constraints.(20, 42, 43) This is distinct from affective empathy—feeling sympathy for the other side—which can sometimes be a liability, leading to unnecessary concessions.(42) A negotiator skilled in cognitive empathy can move beyond rigid positions to uncover underlying interests, allowing for the creation of more creative, integrative, and mutually beneficial agreements. By understanding what the other side truly values, they can craft proposals that meet those needs at a low cost to themselves, expanding the proverbial pie before dividing it. This capacity to "get inside a counterpart's head" promotes trust and facilitates the discovery of solutions that a purely adversarial approach would miss.(42, 44)

Team Performance

The impact of empathy scales from the individual leader to the collective intelligence of an entire team. Research in organizational psychology has identified a construct known as Team Emotion Recognition Accuracy (TERA), or more broadly, Empathic Accuracy.(45, 46, 47, 48) This is the shared, group-level ability of team members to accurately infer one another's emotional and mental states from verbal and non-verbal cues. Studies have found that TERA is a remarkably strong predictor of team performance. In one field study, TERA measured at the time of team formation accounted for over 28% of the variance in team performance ratings nearly a year later.(45) Teams that are good at reading each other are better at coordinating interdependent tasks, managing conflict, and adapting to new challenges.

Taken together, this body of evidence provides unimpeachable proof for the central claim: empathy is a form of intelligence with tangible, measurable, and decisive effects on performance. The modern, interconnected economy, with its emphasis on collaboration, innovation, and service, has placed an unprecedented premium on this social-cognitive skill set. The "soft skill" has become a hard requirement for success. The practical, communication-focused training of "The Good Work" is therefore not just a moral imperative; it is a highly effective professional development program for the 21st century.(25)

The Deliberate Cultivation of Empathic Skill

A crucial feature of any true intelligence is its capacity for development. Empathy is not a fixed, immutable trait that one is simply born with; it is a skill that can be systematically trained and improved through deliberate practice. The scientific evidence for the trainability of empathy is robust and growing, providing a clear pathway for anyone committed to enhancing this vital capacity.

The Efficacy of Empathy Training

The question of whether empathy can be taught has been answered with a definitive "yes." Multiple meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials have concluded that empathy training programs are effective, producing medium effect sizes on average.(49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54) These analyses have also identified key factors that enhance the effectiveness of such training. Notably, programs that focus on developing cognitive and behavioral empathy—such as skills in perspective-taking and active listening—tend to be more effective and produce more sustainable results than those that focus solely on trying to induce affective empathy.(51, 53) This finding aligns perfectly with the neuroscientific understanding of empathy: the top-down mentalizing system, rooted in the brain's highly plastic prefrontal cortex, is more amenable to conscious training than the more automatic, bottom-up mirroring system.

Mindfulness and the Empathic Mind

One of the most powerful modalities for cultivating empathy is mindfulness meditation. A growing body of research demonstrates a strong link between mindfulness practice and enhanced empathic ability.(55, 56, 57, 58, 59) The mechanism is clear: mindfulness trains the core cognitive skills that are the prerequisites for empathy. It strengthens attentional control, allowing one to focus more fully on another person's communication. It enhances emotional regulation, preventing one from being overwhelmed by personal distress. And it fosters a non-judgmental awareness that is essential for genuine perspective-taking. Neuroimaging studies confirm this link, showing that mindfulness practice activates and strengthens the very same brain regions—the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula—that form the core network for empathic processing.(55, 58)

A Practical Protocol for Listening

The most direct and evidence-based method for training cognitive empathy is through the practice of specific communication techniques. The skills outlined in "The Good Work's" Field Manual—active listening, paraphrasing, and validating emotions—are not merely good manners; they constitute a powerful, real-time training protocol for the empathic mind.(25) This protocol can be conceptualized as a three-step "Listening Loop".(60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65)

  1. Ask and Listen Carefully: The first step is to gather high-quality data. This involves asking open-ended questions ("Can you help me understand what this is like for you?") and then listening with full, non-judgmental attention to both the verbal and non-verbal content of the response.(60)

  2. Reflect and Paraphrase: The second step is to verify the accuracy of the data you have received. This is done by reflecting back what you heard in your own words, summarizing both the facts and the underlying feelings ("So, if I'm hearing you right, it sounds like you're feeling frustrated because you feel your opinion isn't being heard. Is that about right?").(25, 60, 62) This is not about agreeing; it is about confirming that your mental model of their state is accurate.

  3. Get Feedback and Adjust: The final step is error-correction. By asking "Is that right?", you give the other person the opportunity to correct or refine your understanding. This feedback allows you to fine-tune your mental model, making it a more accurate representation of their reality.(1, 61, 62)

Regularly practicing this loop is a direct workout for the mentalizing network of the brain. Each cycle is an exercise in building, testing, and refining a mental model of another person's mind—the very definition of cognitive empathy. This practical, skill-based approach is a scientifically validated method for enhancing the most effective and reliable component of our empathic intelligence.

Empathy as the Engine of The Good Work

The body of evidence is clear and convergent. Science has rigorously validated the core premise that empathy, particularly its cognitive dimension, is a high-level, trainable intelligence with profound and measurable effects on our capacity for success, connection, and moral action. This conclusion does not exist in an academic vacuum; it serves as the unshakeable scientific foundation for the entire philosophy of The Good Work. The movement's principles are not articles of faith, but a comprehensive operating system for upgrading our innate but often flawed empathic hardware.

Cognitive empathy is the faculty that makes the core tenets of The Good Work possible. It is the intelligence that allows us to pursue Truth more completely by integrating the perspectives of others. It is the perceptual tool that allows us to recognize our deep Entanglement with other minds. It is the foresight that enables those with power to exercise Asymmetric Responsibility by understanding the potential impact of their actions on the vulnerable. And it is the essential skill that makes the Four Movements of Repair—See, Understand, Act, and Evolve—possible in the wake of conflict.(1, 25)

The known limitations of empathy—its biases toward in-groups, its vulnerability to scale, its potential for emotional burnout—are not weaknesses in this argument.(15, 16, 66) On the contrary, they are the final proof point for why a disciplined, cognitive, and principles-based approach is superior to relying on raw, untutored emotion. The framework of The Good Work is designed precisely to mitigate these known bugs in our natural empathic programming.

Therefore, the cultivation of empathic intelligence is not merely a self-improvement project. It is a fundamental act of resistance against the "Machine" of division, which operates by neurologically severing our connections to one another.(1, 25) It is the most essential skill for building a world that is more coherent, compassionate, and effective. It is the difficult, necessary, and ultimately hopeful Good Work of our time.


Works cited

  1. 01-The Good Work - A Guide to Living with Truth and Empathy

  2. The Psychology of Emotional and Cognitive Empathy | Lesley ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://lesley.edu/article/the-psychology-of-emotional-and-cognitive-empathy

  3. (PDF) Impact of empathic skills to social intelligence - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375264812_Impact_of_empathic_skills_to_social_intelligence

  4. Social Intelligence and Empathy; an Integrated Literature Review, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.abacademies.org/articles/social-intelligence-and-empathy-an-integrated-literature-review-16291.html

  5. Empathy, social intelligence and relationship-based social work - University of East Anglia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://research-portal.uea.ac.uk/en/publications/empathy-social-intelligence-and-relationship-based-social-work

  6. (PDF) A Social-Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228747109_A_Social-Neuroscience_Perspective_on_Empathy

  7. How we empathize with others: A neurobiological perspective - PMC, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3524680/

  8. Exploring the neurological substrate of emotional and social intelligence - Oxford Academic, accessed August 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/126/8/1790/308022

  9. Cognitive Empathy in Subtypes of Antisocial Individuals - PMC, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8287099/

  10. Cognitive Empathy as a Means for Characterizing Human-Human and Human-Machine Cooperative Work - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363840308_Cognitive_Empathy_as_a_Means_for_Characterizing_Human-Human_and_Human-Machine_Cooperative_Work

  11. What Is Cognitive Empathy? Types, Examples & How to Develop It - Mindvalley Blog, accessed August 13, 2025, https://blog.mindvalley.com/cognitive-empathy/

  12. Cognitive Empathy vs. Emotional Empathy - Verywell Mind, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/cognitive-and-emotional-empathy-4582389

  13. A neuroscience perspective on the plasticity of the social and relational brain - PMC, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12096818/

  14. Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3375887/

  15. Why Empathy Is Not a Reliable Source of Information in Moral Decision Making - Gwern.net, accessed August 13, 2025, https://gwern.net/doc/philosophy/ethics/2021-decety.pdf

  16. The Benefits and Costs of Empathy in Moral Decision Making ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-moral-psychology/benefits-and-costs-of-empathy-in-moral-decision-making/E5DD8124EAB0A2E5549E56E7D8B024C9

  17. Full article: Aberrant cognitive empathy in individuals with elevated social anxiety and regulation with emotional working memory training, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699931.2024.2314981

  18. Cognitive and affective empathy relate differentially to emotion regulation - CentAUR, accessed August 13, 2025, https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/99158/

  19. Emotional intelligence - Wikipedia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_intelligence

  20. Negotiation Mastery: Why Emotional Intelligence Matters, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.vantagepartners.com/insights/negotiation-mastery-why-emotional-intelligence-matters

  21. (PDF) The Social Neuroscience of Empathy and Its Implication for Business Ethics, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337605830_The_Social_Neuroscience_of_Empathy_and_Its_Implication_for_Business_Ethics

  22. The Neural Basis of Social Cognition in Typically Developing ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714176/full

  23. Social cognition: Theory of the mind in early childhood, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/social-cognition/according-experts/development-theory-mind-early-childhood

  24. Neural correlates of theory-of-mind are associated with variation in children's everyday social cognition - PubMed Central, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6688452/

  25. 03-The Good Work - Field Edition - A Manual for the New American Resistance

  26. www.cambridge.org, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science/article/anxiety-reduces-empathy-toward-outgroup-members-but-not-ingroup-members/B70872ACE7D6712A3C71B377C2EED6CA#:~:text=I%20argue%20that%20a%20gap,exacerbates%20the%20outgroup%20empathy%20gap.

  27. Language Models Predict Empathy Gaps Between Social In-groups and Out-groups - arXiv, accessed August 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.01030v1

  28. Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4327620/

  29. In-group bias - The Decision Lab, accessed August 13, 2025, https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/in-group-bias

  30. Anxiety Reduces Empathy Toward Outgroup Members But Not Ingroup Members | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319649340_Anxiety_Reduces_Empathy_Toward_Outgroup_Members_But_Not_Ingroup_Members

  31. Dehumanized Perception: A Psychological Means to Facilitate Atrocities, Torture, and Genocide?: Zeitschrift für Psychologie - Hogrefe eContent, accessed August 13, 2025, https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/2151-2604/a000065

  32. Dehumanized Perception: A Psychological Means to Facilitate ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3915417/

  33. Rehumanizing the homeless: Altered BOLD response following contact with an extreme outgroup - bioRxiv, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/462671.full.pdf

  34. Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6696401_Dehumanizing_the_Lowest_of_the_Low_Neuroimaging_Responses_to_Extreme_Out-Groups

  35. Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups - PubMed, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17100784/

  36. Social groups that elicit disgust are differentially processed in mPFC - Sites@Duke Express, accessed August 13, 2025, https://sites.duke.edu/flaubertsbrain/files/2012/08/Harris-and-Fiske-Disgust-article.pdf

  37. 02 - The Spark of Defiance - A Primer for the New American Resistance

  38. Empathetic Leadership: How Leader Emotional Support and ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://cits.tamiu.edu/kock/pubs/journals/2019/Kock_etal_2019_JLOS_EmpathMngtJobPerf.pdf

  39. Empathy in the Workplace A Tool for Effective Leadership*, accessed August 13, 2025, https://cclinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/empathyintheworkplace.pdf

  40. (PDF) Empathy in Leadership: How It Enhances Effectiveness - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361952690_Empathy_in_Leadership_How_It_Enhances_Effectiveness

  41. Emotional Intelligence: What it is and Why it Matters, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.eiconsortium.org/reports/what_is_emotional_intelligence.html

  42. Perspective Taking and Empathy in Business Negotiations - PON, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/dealmaking-daily/to-better-understand-other-negotiators-consider-the-context-nb/

  43. How Does Empathy Impact Negotiation Outcomes? - Lifestyle → Sustainability Directory, accessed August 13, 2025, https://lifestyle.sustainability-directory.com/question/how-does-empathy-impact-negotiation-outcomes/

  44. Emotional Intelligence and Negotiation Performance - Scholarly Commons, accessed August 13, 2025, https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2268&context=faculty_publications

  45. TEAM EMOTION RECOGNITION ACCURACY AND TEAM ..., accessed August 13, 2025, http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/faculty/elfenbeinh/pdf/TeamEmotionRecognition.pdf

  46. Interpersonal accuracy in relation to the workplace, leadership, and ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-psychology-of-perceiving-others-accurately/interpersonal-accuracy-in-relation-to-the-workplace-leadership-and-hierarchy/F20A7BD693EF8465DE643DA7C71BA395

  47. Change in Objective Measure of Empathic Accuracy Following Social Cognitive Training, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00894/full

  48. What Is Empathic Accuracy? - Monitask, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.monitask.com/en/business-glossary/empathic-accuracy

  49. (PDF) The Efficacy of Empathy Training: A Meta-Analysis of ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280219487_The_Efficacy_of_Empathy_Training_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Randomized_Controlled_Trials

  50. Assessing the effect of empathy-enhancing interventions in health education and training: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials | BMJ Open, accessed August 13, 2025, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e036471

  51. The effectiveness of empathy training in health care: a meta-analysis of training content and methods - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8995011/

  52. A meta-analysis of empathy training programs for client populations - Semantic Scholar, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-meta-analysis-of-empathy-training-programs-for-Butters/24ac657d2d4b8eb5c714657fa5cd047d65f8fd35

  53. Categories of Training to Improve Empathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385011726_Categories_of_training_to_improve_empathy_A_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis

  54. The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - PubMed, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26191979/

  55. Full article: Does mindfulness meditation increase empathy? An ..., accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15298868.2016.1269667

  56. (PDF) The mediating role of cognitive and affective empathy in the relationship of mindfulness with engagement in nursing - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338441025_The_mediating_role_of_cognitive_and_affective_empathy_in_the_relationship_of_mindfulness_with_engagement_in_nursing

  57. "Does Mindfulness Support Empathy?" by L. G. Rollins - ScholarWorks at UMass Boston, accessed August 13, 2025, https://scholarworks.umb.edu/doctoral_dissertations/418/

  58. Mindfulness and Empathy: Mediating Factors and Gender Differences in a Spanish Sample, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01915/full

  59. Mindfulness Promotes Online Prosocial Behavior via Cognitive Empathy - PMC, accessed August 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8293796/

  60. Active Listening: The Art of Empathetic Conversation, accessed August 13, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/active-listening/

  61. How To Use Active Listening And Empathy To Build Rapport And Trust - FasterCapital, accessed August 13, 2025, https://fastercapital.com/topics/how-to-use-active-listening-and-empathy-to-build-rapport-and-trust.html/1

  62. How Relationship Managers Strengthen Feedback Loops Through Listening and Empathy, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.zynxhealth.com/insights/relationship-managers-strengthen-feedback-loops/

  63. 7 Tips for Empathic Listening in Social Services | Crisis Prevention Institute (CPI), accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.crisisprevention.com/blog/human-services/7-tips-for-empathic-listening-in-social-services/

  64. (PDF) ACTIVE LISTENING -A MODEL OF EMPATHETIC COMMUNICATION IN THE HELPING PROFESSIONS - ResearchGate, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379083877_ACTIVE_LISTENING_-A_MODEL_OF_EMPATHETIC_COMMUNICATION_IN_THE_HELPING_PROFESSIONS

  65. Empathy and Active Listening- Essential Skills for the Future of Work, accessed August 13, 2025, https://hrs.wsu.edu/empathy-and-active-listening-essential-skills-for-the-future-of-work/

  66. Empathy Is not Evidence: Four Traps of Commodified Empathy - EPIC people, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.epicpeople.org/commodified-empathy/

Adam Blak
Previous

What is Coherence and Why It's Your Superpower